It sucks when you try really hard to improve search engine rankings and your hard work actually lowers them. Unfourtunely there is a vast quantity of wrong information out there, and sometimes you will be misinformed.![]()
Make sure that you correct yourself if you use any of these common, yet bad techniques.
Nofollow
Nofollow started out as a great idea, a basic html attribute that tells search engines not to follow the link. Google said to use it to prevent link spam (commonly found in comments), link to a website that has questionable content (if the website is illegal or something similar), and when selling paid links.
However, webmasters soon started abusing the system. They thought that they could slap a Nofollow attribute on all links and prevent any link juice loss. This seemed like a reasonable idea at the time, so many webmasters followed it.
This does not work at all because you still lose link juice, and you mess up the entire linking system. Read my blog post Everyone Needs to Switch to Dofollow for more information.
Directories
Directories started out as a easy way to build links: everyone loved them. Now that search engines cracked down on directories, there aren’t many worthwhile directories to submit to. Submitting your website to hundreds of directories will get you nowhere with search engines, and you might even get penalized (I can’t conform that though).
The two most worthwhile directories are Yahoo and DMOZ. There are some other good ones out there, but most directories are pointless to submit to.
Link Building
Links building is a great way to enhance search engine position, but many people do it wrong. You should be shooting for natural, high quality links, but many people get spammy, low quality, unrelated to website topic links.
Using article marketing just to build links, using forums just to build links, commenting just to build links, submitting your site to way too many directories, and building links much to fast are just some ways to abuse link building. When you do this, you are only hurting your website. A good post to read to learn more is Link Building is Like Acne.
Anchor Text
Anchor text — if you don’t know — is the text that displays the link. For example the link "Link Building is Like Acne" above would be the anchor text for that link.
A story that comes to mind when thinking of anchor text is the Google bomb Bush story. Apparently the Bush administration’s website was linked to so much with anchor text along the lines of "miserable failure" that it came up first for that term in Google even though the words weren’t found on the website.
Yes, anchor text is powerful, but don’t misuse it. Google wants links to look natural, and you want people to click on links. When you use the text that best fits the situation you are using the link, people will click through more, you will have varied anchor text (so you won’t get penalized by search engines), and you won’t sound awkward.
I recommend that you stay away from creating artificial anchor text (linking to a link using your targeted keyword over and over) as many people do, but I do recommend that you are aware of it. For instance, don’t use the anchor text "here", when you can rephrase the sentence to include better anchor text.
photo credit: Daniel Suarez™




{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }
-
1
Lyka Adams (1 comments) January 19, 2010 at 7:06 am
-
-
2
Kim Ramsey (2 comments) November 30, 2009 at 2:21 am
-

-
3
Kyle: New Car Lemon Law (1 comments) November 23, 2009 at 8:33 pm
-

phpNot all blogs do that. As some of you know, some webmasters offers dofollow link in their comment box. You can search for sites like that when you see “CommentLuv” or other dofollow plug-ins near the comment box.
Why? It's like a simple thank you gift from the webmaster when you give good comment or feedback as a reader. Yes, your blog or website will be prone to spamming but it's up to the webmaster to moderate those comments that is likely to be posted and those link-dropping-non-sense-comments spammers.
[Reply]
I agree with the directories. Most directories are dead or inactive, since they are owned by one person. The tendency of which is that the contents of the first directory is automatically similar to the second directory.
I’m still not sure about the discussion on link building. Some say that to you must comment on related sites, while some say you can comment on any sites. Maybe it’s just a matter of trial and error on the site owner’s part if what technique they will follow.
[Reply]
Jake O'Callaghan (105 comments) Reply:
December 3rd, 2009 at 4:02 pm
Commenting on getting links from related sites will look much better in Google’s eyes. However, commenting really isn’t a good way to build links, only traffic.
[Reply]
Jake,
You make some good points and I generally agree. Many of the less desirable aspects of each tactic are the result of those that just plain abuse them. Some of the tactics you mention still work, but I think that the point is that SEOs and others should focus on building a strong foundation and using those methods as secondary tools.
Kyle: New Car Lemon Law´s last blog ..Do I Have A Case? Answer These Three Questions.
[Reply]
Jake O'Callaghan (105 comments) Reply:
November 29th, 2009 at 9:52 am
Exactly, I wouldn’t completely denounce the tactics as long as users don’t abuse them. However, there are much better SEO techniques.
[Reply]